最近提交的內容
單擊下面的一項或多項提交內容,在您的提交內容中對其進行標記。
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1628
Re- #MoreLawFaculTea1616
ADRC recommends/approves reasonable adjustments (incl. extra time), Colleges have no role in it.
do check the facts
#MoreLawFaculTea1590
I did my exams at College. It was literally one-on-one invgilation, unsure what you meant by "less strictly invigilated" but thats probably not true.
發表於: Aug. 14, 2026, 5:04 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1627
I'm really conflicted between choosing labour or jurisprudence and was wondering if anyone can offer any advice on either xx
發表於: Aug. 14, 2026, 5:03 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1626
so... who is doing legal history next year #therealones
發表於: July 26, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1625
I have now submitted a series of FOI requests to the law faculty and the University of Cambridge regarding exam arrangements and will get back to you with some data asap. Xx
發表於: July 22, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1624
if you think you have evidence of people cheating or "abusing the access arrangements system", please take it to the faculty rather than making entirely unbased claims here, you're not helping anyone
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:17 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1623
#MoreLawFaculTea1616
Or the huge disparity in exam accommodation %s between those who were privately versus publicly educated…
It starts before uni and I doubt the gaming of the systemic inequity stops there
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1622
I don’t get the aversion to discussing extra time or issues with people abusing it by some of those who receive it. Nobody is accusing you personally — there is almost certainly abuse of the system occurring, though without hard evidence nobody can be certain how much. Given that, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to say that the Faculty should be more scrupulous about these arrangements
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1621
Of course this has devolved into questions on why disabled people need exam allowances in the first place, because you *think* some people have somehow gamed it, for god's sake leave us alone. It's benefits all over again
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1620
#MoreLawFaculTea1614
there are no PQs any more for CCJC. in terms of changing the format, they've reduced the number of questions (for reference, there were 10 questions this year) - this means that certain questions that used to come out every year did not come out this year, and there was a more limited selection to choose from. it also seems like they marked more harshly this year - it doesn't seem like the "easy first" it was touted to be previously anymore
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
More Law Facul-Tea
#MoreLawFaculTea1619
#MoreLawFaculTea1613
The person who i thought topped tripos last year didn't have extra time and is literally the nicest person i've ever met??
發表於: July 22, 2026, 2:16 p.m.