Josenian Freedom Wall

#JFW703 my dearest, #JFW694 MAN let me live pls 😢 6’5 futch major monogram mm flip it around wicked witch isnr real naay ethereal esoteric niche whimsical baddie goddess behind ts LET ME LIVE‼️‼️ and and and no need fb comsec atngan taka back gate ditso if u want 🫦 (+++ go home gay girl ❤️‍🩹 DAGHAN MI EYE CONTACT NI MONCHIICHI ENJOYER FORWARD PHOTOGRAPHER PAG ORIENTATION WEEK 2024 ‼️)

#JFW702 Hello, asking for the attention sa mga SSC or naay kaila nga SSC huhuhu, unsa man jud naay klase ugma Saturday or wala? Saba kaayo among gc nga mo landfall daw ang bagyo ugma tapos nag post na ang cwts sa coverage for tomorrow's exam. Sgeh na guyzzz para di nko mag expect huhuhu kapoy na kaayo og commute from San Fernando to Colon😭😭😭😭

#JFW701 Reply to #JFW696: I agree with this aswell, maka notice bitaw ko na wala kaayoy lihok ang other SSC HRs sa SCS (my dept), Aside from Jumpstart, I also cannot feel that presence even though makasabot rasad ko na busy sila for their thesis and projects. I'm glad that other people are noticing this, especially towards some who are just riding the hype of the elections, but once nadawat, ma ghost-project sila when the time comes for them to step up. I also hope na this conveys as geniune concern without malice, and I really want to see if the elected officials can actually help and contribute to the welfare of the students, dili lang pa-reiterate ng formal photos and sharedpost sa SSC page.

#JFW700 Included ang sabado sa class suspension? Hoping for an update from the school po #pleaserespectpost

#JFW699 Can a Nursing (M) × Accountancy (F) relationship work? Asking for a friend

#JFW698 @CWTS ASA NA ANG ANNOUNCEMENT MAG EXAM TAG GA LANDFALL??????😭

#JFW696 To SBM HRs, I would like to respectfully ask: unsa man gyud ang gamit sa mga SSC House Representatives sa ilang respective schools? Wala ko kahibaw sa activities sa uban schools, pero as for SBM, I honestly can’t really feel the presence of the SBM HRs. Wala koy nakita or nadunggan nga activity nila for SBM, or bisan unsa sa ilang gi-promise during the elections. (If I’m wrong, please correct me — basin wala lang jud ko kabalo nga naa moy activity as HRs.) Honestly, it sometimes feels like the position is more for the name rather than for service. I know that confession walls are not the appropriate venue for this, but I’ve observed and heard from others that SOME SSC officers don’t take concerns seriously if they are being criticized, and some even resort to “panlibak” instead of addressing the issue constructively. To be fair, the lineup for SBM HRs was promising, and I had high hopes when I trusted you all. Right now, I must admit I’m a bit disappointed. Some of you, based on my personal experience, show attitudes that do not inspire confidence. Others seem to be riding on the hype of SSC without contributing meaningfully to the initiatives or the community. I believe I’m not the only one noticing this, other students have shared similar sentiments. I hope this message is taken in the spirit of constructive feedback. I genuinely want to see SBM HRs actively contributing to the school and fulfilling the responsibilities for which you were elected. Thank you for taking the time to read this.

#JFW695 Shout out diay ko sa kato taga Tourism, if I'm not mistaken si Christine ug si Raya! Grabe jud ka-energetic, ka-approachable, ka-vibes ninyo oy hahaha funny kaymu ambot lang jud. Labi na si Christine… hala oy crush daw ka sa akong friend cm daw mo sa EP 2 ninyo Paki-confirm lang daw if WLW ba ka kay murag nag-hope na siya HAHAHA bye!

#JFW694 Hello to 6’5 futch major monogram mm flip it around wicked witch‼️👿 I liked monchichi forward photographer FIRST (show yourself and comment here on this post if you’re real) #COMPETITIVE #LetTheBestGayWin

#JFW693 I've been seeing alot of ragebait posts lately against different student orgs, and how these organizations respond to these criticisms and concerns. I'm not affiliated with either so I'd like to give my thoughts on this 'issue'. I understand that each organization is different, with varying approaches to how they deal with criticism, either through humor or through formal responses. However, I've noticed that some of these responses seem to "invalidate" or to "one-up" the criticism, complemented by a barrage of their sycophants, supporters and even other organization members. Even though some, if not most of these criticisms are merely surface-level instigations for the sake of such, there are still some of these concerns that do have a hint of truth within them, even though it's superficial facade. The situation I'd like to highlight for this is the post that pointed out the lack of movement and visibility of some representatives of the student council, the response of which was through a council member giving a realistic and plausible explanation of these shortcomings, due to factors such as the disruption of classes due to calamities, and the adjustment period for the new congress. Although I do find the statement commendable, it seems to invalidate the 'hint of truth' that was implied within the original post, despite it's blunt, borderline insulting nature. I can (circumstantially) attest to this concern as I have personally seen these varying 'councils' and 'congresses' in the university come and go throughout the years here. While they are active in facilitating events and activities to cater towards the student body, I find that SOME of these "elected representatives" who seemed to tirelessly advocate for their initiatives underneath their student party, seem to 'disappear' once the position actually reaches them. My observation is not an invalidation of the council and their efforts, as I understand the great burden of their efforts, such as balancing these labor-intensive duties while being students themselves. I am also not directly condemning them, as it may be their first time in a prominent position such as this, and that can lead to some difficulties in the implementation or execution of their proposed projects and programs. However, given the way that the situation has been handled, especially with the supporting replies and engagement from the aforementioned groups to the response levied, seemed positioned as an attempt to close off further discussion, despite a seemingly brief consideration to the original criticism. Again, I understand where they're coming from, and that they seem to not pay any mind to engage further, probably to focus rather on their own efforts, which I can admire, but I do think this raises a concern for me as a student. While there are proper channels of greviance that the both council and university has implemented, I personally believe that it is unlikely that these types concerns may truly be resolved or effectively be dealt with in a definitive manner given it's private nature. This is why I am thankful for non-partisan pages such as this, in which a "fair ground" can be established between these leaders and students. I also hope that these student leaders can view the criticisms held towards them or their organizations not as an implication of attack in which it could easily be solvable through a lengthy paragraph of defense, but rather to develop an open conversation towards the person/s concerned that have raised these affairs, in a way that is not dismissive within the guise of constructive wording. It must be neccessary to hold these elected individuals, officers and executive individuals responsible, as accountability is not antagonism. There also must be a constant back-and-forth feedback to ensure that their promises are kept, transparency becomes a given rather than a privilege, and that a more effective synergy is created between the student body and the student leaders, representatives and officers govern over.