USLT Freedom Wall

#LFW8177 HOY! Ibalik niyo wash day pls lang naman! Hindi na maka porma ang oat😭😭😭 Submitted: March 24, 2026 7:35:46 PM PST

#LFW8176 I want to share my “multo” in USL. What’s one greatest heartbreak ba kamo? It’s when someone chooses their friend not because they love them more, but because they’re afraid sa “FO”. Natakot silang mawalan ng “circle,” matakot na mapag-iwanan sa school. And in the process, they forget something important. Nakalimutan nila na bago ka pa maging “jowa,” bago pa maging komplikado ang lahat… ikaw muna yung unang naging kaibigan nila. Ikaw yung naging sandalan, yung naging best friend, yung naging pinaka-kampi nila sa lahat. Imagine from being a friend to best friend to lovers. Tapos yung partner mo mas natakot mawalan ng friend over sa longer term relationship sa sinira nilang friendship to become lovers. Pero sa huli, they chose the people na dumating lang sa gitna over the person who was there from the very beginning, grabe noh? And that’s what makes it hurt even more. Kasi hindi ka lang iniwan bilang jowa… iniwan ka rin bilang kaibigan. Iniwan ka rin bilang bestfriend nila. Imagine saying that you’ll become better for someone else than being better for your partner? we met in highschool and last until college but recently it become complicated, pero yung alam niyang kayang ayusin basta mag bago, pero mas pinili niya maging gago? how sad diba? XD Submitted: March 24, 2026 8:51:53 PM PST

#LFW8175 Legit pag tuwing dumadaan sa rooms nang nga accounting students tuwing exams may pa libreng ASMR 😭😭😭 Submitted: March 25, 2026 7:34:54 AM PST

#LFW8174 who’s our presidential bet this upcoming election? 🤔 Submitted: March 25, 2026 4:07:10 PM PST

#LFW8173 Hon. City Mayor of Tuguegarao City Dear Mayora, I am writing to formally inquire if there is a new memorandum authorizing an increase in tricycle fares in our city. Last week, my two grandparents (Senior Citizens) and I (a student) were charged ₱120 for a trip from Robinsons Tuguegarao to Ugac Highway. The driver charged ₱100 for the trip to the Plaza and an additional ₱20 for the destination—essentially ₱40 per person. While we understand the rising cost of gasoline, this rate seems excessive, especially since no student or senior citizen discounts were applied. Many commuters, including PWDs and students, are being overcharged by drivers taking advantage of the situation. I respectfully request your office to clarify the official fare matrix and take the necessary actions to protect the riding public from these unauthorized rates. Thank you for your time and continued service to Tuguegarao. Respectfully, Citizen of Tuguevarao City Submitted: March 25, 2026 6:09:32 PM PST

#LFW8172 My rant about the pathway from Field to N building has finally been answered, yay! No more cat crap-smelling shoes. Submitted: March 26, 2026 9:48:43 AM PST

#LFW8171 sa mga nakatira sa may Andal sa red at green building. Kung sino man po ang kumuha sa parcel ko na iniwan ni kuya rider sa may tindahan, ibalik mo na please toothpaste ko yannnn!!! Submitted: March 26, 2026 7:28:02 PM PST

#LFW8170 SOBRANG KULANG NUNG 300 WORDS NA COMMENT SA EVAL HA. MAG LALABAS PA SANA 'KO NANG SAMA NG LOOB SA ISANG PROF JAN NA PARABANG!!! Submitted: March 26, 2026 7:34:01 PM PST

#LFW8169 First of all, I’m not a member of the Knights of the Altar or a CICM scholar—just a genuine volunteer lang to our beloved university. So, may i ask? Paano naging President ng campus mission volunteer (CMV) ang wala pang 1year experience sa pagiging volunteer? Andami naman attang deserving dyan na high school palang volunteer na hanggang college. And pwede ba malaman ang Criteria? Ang alam ko kasi wala dapat Pres ng cmv 'cause lahat eh volunteer na willing to SERVE, NOT TO BE SERVED!!!!!!! Submitted: March 26, 2026 8:48:21 PM PST

#LFW8168 AN OPEN LETTER TO THE MEDTECH FACULTY Good day! First and foremost, we express our expectation that the memoranda and policies set by the department are consistently upheld—for the sake of fairness, transparency, and integrity among all students. However, recent implementations have raised serious concerns and have led many to question the consistency of these policies. To begin with, the implementation of the Simulated Board Examination (SBE) is unclear. It has been stated that this applies to all programs with board examinations. However, why does it appear that only students who failed MTAP/Comprehensive 2 are required to take it? What about those who failed MTAP 1, considering that all are under the same academic year? Should not such policies be applied uniformly to avoid any perception of bias or inconsistency? Secondly, the sudden introduction of a “Removal Examination” is highly questionable. Based on the existing policies and guidelines, students who fail the comprehensive examination during the readmission stage are expected to shift programs or transfer to another institution. Why, then, is there now an additional opportunity in the form of a removal examination? More importantly, why is this only being implemented now? This situation raises concerns about fairness, particularly for previous batches of students who strictly complied with the same policies but were not given similar opportunities. Some were required to enroll for an additional semester and accept the consequences of the system as it was. In contrast, the current changes appear to provide more chances to the present batch, creating a clear disparity. Furthermore, there are reports regarding the involvement of “unpaid” faculty mentors. If this is indeed the case, this is not only a systemic concern but also an issue of fairness toward the professors. Teaching is a profession that deserves proper recognition and compensation, and such arrangements should not be normalized. It has also long been observed that there is a misalignment between what is taught in MTAP and the content of the comprehensive examinations. This raises an important question: what is the true purpose of the current system? Perhaps it is time to revisit and improve the approach. Strengthening the MTAP program, hiring additional faculty, and aligning teaching strategies with the competencies assessed in examinations could provide students with clearer direction in their preparation—without the need to heavily rely on external review centers. If the goal is to uphold quality education, then policies must be clear, firm, and consistently implemented. Adjusting policies depending on the situation undermines trust and creates confusion among students. At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that accountability does not rest solely on the faculty. Students must also take responsibility for their own performance. Repeated failures should prompt reflection, reassessment of study habits, and a stronger commitment to improvement. Success in the board examinations ultimately depends not on the number of chances given, but on discipline, preparation, and personal effort. In the end, the call is simple yet significant: fairness must be upheld at all times, and policies must be applied equally—for the benefit of all, not just a select few. Thank you! Submitted: March 27, 2026 12:24:09 AM PST